TOPICS:

Questions about God

The Spiritual Realm

Questions by Jesus

Jesus' Identity 
Jesus' Life
Jesus' Teachings
Jesus Today
Early Christianity
Modern Christianity
Bible Interpretations
Traditional Spiritual Teachings
Modern Spiritual Teachings

Spiritual Teachers of the past

New Spiritual Teachers
Progressive Revelation and Channeling
General Religious Issues
Religious Practices
Good and Evil 
The Soul
General Psychological Issues
Healing Psychological problems

General Questions about Spiritual Growth

Using Spiritual Tools
Walking the Spiritual Path (general)
Walking the Path to Christhood
Overcoming the ego
Practical Living
General Questions about relationships
Love and Sexuality
Planetary Issues
Current Affairs
Prophecy
Miscellaneous
About this Website 

Question: We know that the Buddha's teaching about the Middle Way is not the middle between two dualistic extremes. Now I'm curious about why it became called the Middle Way.



NOTE: This answer was given on December 30, 2007, during the Shangra-la New Years conference in Los Angeles, California.

Answer from Gautama Buddha:


As we have explained many times, when we give a teaching, we are not attempting to bring forth the highest possible teaching. For we do not even operate with the concept of the highest. For this is, of course, a dualistic concept of high and low and of comparisons. So what we give is a teaching that is adapted to the specific people that we are seeking to reach. And we must adapt a teaching to their culture, to their belief system, to their state of consciousness.

So when I brought forth the teachings of Buddhism, you had a situation, my beloved, where Hindu society had become so rigid with the many artificial constructs of the Brahmins, that they had solidified into the outer path of ritual. Yet on the other hand you had a long-standing tradition in India of the ascetics who had withdrawn from the world, who put their bodies through all kinds of extreme measures and tortures, almost as a way to punish the body for providing a prison for the mind.

And so it was my aim to bridge the gap, where many spiritual people of the time thought that they had to be in either one extreme or in the other. And as I discovered myself, neither extreme could lead to enlightenment. But the enlightenment had to be found somewhere, not in-between, but in a different approach.

So at the time the concept of the Middle Way, especially in the Eastern culture, did not have the same meaning that you have today in the West, where the Western mind is more linear—and thus thinks of the Middle Way as being the mid-point between the two extremes. Whereas to the Eastern mind, especially at the time, it had a different concept, a different connotation, of being something beyond, beyond the old approaches.

Back to topic main page.

Back to Answers main page.

Back to top

Copyright © 2007 by Kim Michaels

 

The Art of Non-war

This book is ingenious because it is written in such a universal way that it can appeal to just about anyone who is concerned about war and peace. It does not require the reader to believe in ascended masters or channeling but simply states teachings that have such an appeal to the heart that the spiritually aware people will feel it resonating with something in their beings.
Click here for more information.